Feedburner
HomeVideosForumsGalleryMailPeople ExplorerSearchBlogBookmarksStoreSign UpLogin

Keep The Videos Alive: To The Theater

JohnnyC
Actions
Add Friend
Subscribe to Blog
Add to Preferred
Send Message
View Profile
Latest Entries
COMICS: Uncanny X-Men
Watchmen: A Non-Review...Review
NEWS: Marvel Chokes on a Royale with Cheese...
COMICS: Secret Invasion #8 and Secret Invasion: Dark Reign
COMICS: Ender's Game #1
COMICS: This Week in MARVEL COMICS
Who Will Watch THE WATCHMEN?
REVIEW: The Incredible Hulk
COMICS: One Hell of a Week...
REVIEW: Secret Invasion #1
Archives
April 2009 (1)
February 2009 (1)
January 2009 (1)
December 2008 (1)
October 2008 (1)
August 2008 (2)
June 2008 (1)
May 2008 (1)
April 2008 (1)
March 2008 (3)
February 2008 (4)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (1)
November 2007 (1)
Watchmen: A Non-Review...Review

I’m not really sure what I can do here. Warner Bros has put a moratorium on spoilers in reviews of “Watchmen” until next week, and I’ll respect their wishes.

 

So don’t worry…no spoilers here.

 

But I was lucky enough to see it last night at a private screening, and while I won’t talk about specifics, I’ll share some thoughts.

 

If you’re not excited about “Watchmen” yet…start getting excited.

 

It’s fucking awesome.

 

Director Zack Snyder (“300”) took the story that no one else has been able to tell..the story that everyone thought totally un-adaptable (looking at you, 20th Century Fox). One that was considered too violent for mainstream audiences. Too dense. Too verbose. Snyder took that story…and he fucking nailed it.

 

It’s all there. To the tiniest detail. The production design, the costumes, and the overall atmosphere show an attention to detail that is borderline obsessive on the part of the filmmakers involved. Rorschach’s mask. Night Owl’s ship Archimedes. Bubastis. The Gunga Diner. The Comedian’s smiling button. The magazine stand. (and yes, for all of you curious people…lots of glowing blue Doc Manhattan penis). They don’t shy away from the violence either, pulling no punches…in fact, they hit harder.

 

Some fanboys are bound to bitch about the ending, which was slightly altered from the source material. One plot device is substituted for another, but the result is the same. The fanboys that will cry blasphemy are the same idiots who whined when Peter Jackson cut Tom Bombadil from “Lord of the Rings” (really now?). The film’s ending is still just as devastating as the book.

 

If you have any appreciation of the graphic novel whatsoever, start getting excited.

 

The clock is almost at midnight…



2/18/2009 12:04:00 AM | permalink | comments (3 | add) |
 
Comments (add comment)
 
Johnnyc commented on February 25th, 2009 at 2:11 PM
You're right. My mistake.

Adding THE in front was incorrect. I'll correct it in the post.

But I love getting corrected by THE Anonymous poster (lame, btw) who has the pompous smugness of Comic Book Guy from THE Simpsons. Or is it just Simpsons?

But, what do I know? I'm not really a fan.

message
Anonymous commented on February 24th, 2009 at 8:54 PM
If you were really a fan, you'd know the biggest blasphemy is calling it "THE Watchmen." It's just Watchmen. Whenever I see or hear the title with "The" in front of it, It makes me cringe.

Watchmen. You think Watchmen was amazing.

delete
Iceman0440 commented on February 23rd, 2009 at 12:23 PM
Hey Johnny! Lucky dog, being able to see Watchmen! I didn't know much about the book - I went to Borders with a Holiday Gift Card in December and bought it - I did like it but was skeptical about the screen adaptation - I figured - Oh, they'll change the ending to make it appeal to main stream audiences but after reading your teaser - I am anxious to see it - I trust your judgement so its a relief to hear its not disappointing!

message
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertising supports DoorQ.com , please contact us if you'd like to be featured.

Terms of Service | Privacy | About Us

©2010 DoorQ
All rights reserved.
Powered by Pointblanc and Ausjam.

(Generated 6:19:32 AM CST)